you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

This is not at all correct. The issue in Schenk wasn't whether you could or could not falsely shout fire in a crowded theater.

You may not falsely yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so is a criminal breach of peace.

Schenk and Brandenberg are incitement cases. Not being able to falsely yell fire in a crowded theater is axiomatic proof that the framer's intent wasn't to ban limits on speech that obviously serves no valid free speech purpose, such as falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater.

You absolutely have the right to truly yell fire in a crowded theater, though no duty to do so!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Did you not read the quote and source I provided that shows that I am correct?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    You read it wrong. You may not falsely shout fire in a crowded theater. You obviously don't have a lot of experience reading legal cases. It's okay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments