CHILLICOTHE, Ohio — A recent incident at Adena Health System has intensified scrutiny of its cardiology department. A 65-year-old woman died during what should have been a routine heart catheterization, leading to pressing questions about the practices and credentials of the physicians involved. What happened after her time of death is concerning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)

What do you mean? It's perhaps the most apt analogy I can think of. In the strictest literal sense, physiological care is a flesh mechanic servicing your flesh parts. The main difference here is a matter of scope, but that is the point of analogies; to reframe a thought in a smaller and comprehensible way.

Only way we could stay 1:1 is if the discussion is solely populated with qualified medical professionals and not a mix of differently educated laypeople.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Laypeople is the time-honored term unless you're specifically referring to men. Although in certain religious contexts, "the laity" is preferred.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Laypeople is a very new term. Layman is the time honored term, because people think -man means male. Werelay and wyflay would be gendered terms specifically referring to men or women, layman is ungendered.

    In recent times we've changed the meaning of the suffix -man to be synonymous with the prefix were-.

    It's a shame, because it implies we were something we weren't (re: sexism in that part of language) - but I am not defending the stance of not changing it. Just be aware: it's new.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments