1997
Is it just me or did anyone else became a more avid poster since joining lemmy? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
509 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

On reddit I was a lurker that posted like once or twice a year, but ever since joining lemmy I've started posting multiple times a day.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

I was able to do that back in 1990 on FidoNet, again on usuenet in the mid-late 90s, on IRC in the 90s and 00s and using google to search forums in the 00's until the centralized systems killed them. IRC, usenet and others still run, I can still email people I want to talk to as well.

What you are arguing for is a smooth, slick, paid for, UX. Minimal UI's and typing "@" in names is too much. Looking at lists is annoying so you want it curated for you. VCs dumped money on private UX and now people think its essential. We have always been able to communicate directly, there is no technical limitation.

Its in the minds of the users and the unwillingness of some to see a different domain name or try a new UX flow.

Get some VC money drop 20m or so on Fedi UX and all of a sudden people will see very little difference.

Or just wait, I remember when the linux desktop was a joke too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    What? What am I arguing for? I'm only explaining my take on the current status quo.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    i get what you are saying but thats not a reason to simply default to them, perfectly possible to post here and there, even with API blocks, it will come in time.

    sure follow your fav movie star, no need to sit there engaging and giving them free content. i've existed on the internet just fine for over 30 years, tbh the centralized sites have only made things more difficult by your own admission. its going to be on us to build new social networks that....work. It always has been.

    People follow the content producers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    My own admission?

    I think you've seriously misread what kind of person you're talking to. I am by no means in favor of the current norm of every communication app in existence being or becoming "AI" driven doom-scrolling traps. They're following the money, and hence all doing the same thing... Not one is still functioning with communication as goal number one.

    The people are already rejecting them. But it will be so fucking slow. For years to come, people will still be going onto twitter and facebook to see what the world has to say. Even if it says nothing, as long as there is content, many will just keep going as usual.

    When phones and mail were the norm, everyone happily paid to be heard beyond where just their voice can reach. Not so much today. Today, if you can't complain to millions that your coffee got cold this morning, some think that's a violation of your right to free speech.

    I very much look forward to a future where social media is an open standard, which anyone can access. One which we pay for, where appropriate, instead of commercialize or demand out of thin air. I imagine one day, protocols like ActivityPub powering government run, taxpayer funded, official instances of communication software, which federates with private, independent and other national instances, alike.

    Or even just a posting script that speaks the right API someone threw together in an afternoon.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •