you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I mean, banning military-style guns is a ban though.

Realistically we need regulation on who can own guns, not what guns they can own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That’s semantics. Banning specific people from owning guns is still a ban by your same logic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We already ban people from using guns. Felons, drug users, spousal abusers, etc. That's all part and parcel of filling out the purchase form.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Fucking bullshit that holding a medical card prevents me legally owning a firearm but Cletus next door owns an arsenal and HAS TO DRINK TO STAY ALIVE BECAUSE HES AN ENDSTAGE ALCOHOLIC WETBRAIN WITH NO IMPULSE CONTROL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's going to be interesting to see the lawyers challenge that for Hunter Biden's coke habit.

    https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/09/hunter-biden-second-amendment-legal-defense.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I think equating cocaine and cannabis is pretty silly. Regardless, people of perfectly sound mind and judgment use recreational drugs, of which alcohol is one. My point is that what I choose to ingest shouldn't disqualify me from a right the rest of the "drug free" community does not. The status of my mental health is what should disqualify me.

  • source
  • parent