75
[New Rule discussion] No Editorializing Article Titles. The original title of the article must be used. (lemmy.ca)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by [M] to c/main@lemmy.ca
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Edit: This rule seems to be much more nuanced and requires more thought than we had put in, please continue to discuss below.

It is NOT in effect at this time but highly recommend for regional subreddits at least.

The above rule has been added to the instance and will be enforced instance wide. This rule is very common within most existing communities where news articles are shared and avoids sensationalizing the story or attempts at steering discussion by the user posting the article.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Yeah. I've seen some like that, but really at that point I would look for another source, or make it clear that it's editorialized title.

I think something to consider really with all rules is there's always wiggle room and edge cases. With every rule, to cover all those edge cases, it would get so convoluted and long that nobody would read it.

Perhaps for the communities that see this kind of rule as appropriate, it should be more so "Avoid editorializing Article Titles"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Yup. Some rules don't have many corner cases. E.g. no bigotry. The more corner cases there are the fuzzier it gets and the more it drifts towards a recommendation than a hard rule. Some of those corner cases could be filtered by context. Many corner cases might not be relevant in a news community for example. In such a context a rule instead of recommendation might be appropriate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •