There is loads of stuff they didn't get right. The benefit of the narrative format is that any specific details they get blatantly wrong they can spin as just being part of the fictional narrative and not a deliberate prediction. They can also shrug off discredit by claiming that only their technical predictions were accurate, not their political predictions. In fact, as we've speculated recently on sneerclub, one move the boosters may make is blaming the bubble pop (and subsequent failure to produce AGI) on the Democrats winning, because obviously if the LLM companies had kept up their momentum just a few months longer surely they would have achieved recursive self improvement (and all the wondrous things they've promised that would follow).
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
replies: