There's no way you can get "cheap disposable labour isn't a tool of corporations" out of what I said. It's literally the opposite of what I said. I referred to the more relevant parts of Marx's work to the problems you think you identified. It's pretty weird to use Marx only to comment on immigration policy and ignore anything he said about socioeconomics.

You're getting upset I pointed out that you misapplied American political rhetoric to Canada. If you don't like American politics, then stop using it. I'm the one telling you to leave American political rhetoric out.

Implying that illegal immigration is indeed a significant problem in USA?

That's only the implication to someone who believes "Republican rhetoric" is truthful by nature. But who could possibly be that stupid?

Cuz I assure you, leftists and commies there still argue that illegal immigration is not at all a significant problem in USA.

So anyone that's not a Republican is a leftist or commie?

Marx and Engles famously wrote a whole bunch of eurocentric and bigoted nonsense. Who takes those racist idiots seriously in 2026 other than confused commies?

The things the Republicans have been saying and doing are far more geocentric and bigoted but you just argued how they were in the right. Is your problem that what Marx and Engels wrote wasn't stupid enough? But what does this have to do with the fact that what you'er mad at them for writing is more relevant than what they referred to Marx about. It's weird you got so sidetracked by this that you brought in Engels out of nowhere too.

You’re not about to convince the majority that Trudeau era policy is not mass migration and is overall good for the average citizens.

It'd be weird if I did considering I wasn't doing that at all.

You’re not about to convince the majority that Trudeau era policy is not mass migration

You sound like a clown.