you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

This is literally just threatening to do the thing that everyone already knew he was going to do.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

    Also, frankly, what a lot of presidents pretty much do.

    I guess the biggest problem is that usually stops short of the budget/debt ceiling bills, so if he sticks to his guns of 'veto no matter what', hard to see how budget bills can work anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child)

    If you have 2/3rds of Senate, sure.

    But short of getting a bunch of people willing to visibly undermine Trump from his own party, that's not going to happen. Keep in mind these were the same people who didn't like the optics of removing Trump even after he lost and was on his way out and actively incited a violent insurrection. If they won't even vote to remove what was presumed to be a dead-end politician on his way out of politics anyway, then they sure as hell won't go against him on a veto.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment