spoilerThe Michigan Democratic Party kicked Rep. Haley Stevens out of its ranks Sunday, after she endorsed Michigan’s GOP Senate nominee, Mike Rogers — over Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, who defeated her in the primary.

“Congresswoman Stevens is not a current member of the Michigan Democratic Party, nor will she be in the future,” the state party’s chair, Curtis Hertel, said in a post Sunday on X.

Hertel announced the decision just over an hour after Stevens released an endorsement video for Rogers. That video followed days of public friction with El-Sayed, much of it over the candidate’s stance on Israel, the same issue that made their primary bitter and divisive.

In her endorsement video, Stevens insisted she was “still a very proud Democrat.”

“I’m just letting you know where I am,” she said.

Michigan’s Senate race is seen as close, and polls suggest El-Sayed does not have the same level of support that other statewide Democratic candidates in Michigan do. While Democrats could achieve their goal of retaking the Senate via several scenarios, nearly all of the most plausible ones require them to win in Michigan.

Stevens’s endorsement enraged Democrats across Michigan — and the country — who have been encouraging her and El-Sayed to present a united front.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 31 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

He's also a healthcare guy. I think he'll do good there and narrowly on Palestine, but be a significant roadblock to the left elsewhere. Especially economically. It's only a pivot in the sense that Palestine is such a wedge issue for politicians that he's limited to one small faction in the party, and they're voting left on economic issues I think he'll waver on in some dramatic John Fetterman-esque way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 7 hours ago* (3 children)

    I see 2 possible paths for him

    if he stays in the senate then there doesn't even need to be any pivot or selling out, nothing ever happens in the senate and 1 senator can't change shit

    the other path is more interesting, immediately after winning he could stop kneeling for the establishment and instead stand tall and announce he's running for president in 2028

    there are no good 2028 candidates at the moment and I see no where else the dems could get anyone halfway acceptable, the best they have was AOC and I'm gonna need her to at least apologize for lying on behalf of Genocide Joe and throw that whole admin under the bus like they deserve before I even consider her

    he could still betray us but maybe he actually ends up holding some of the war criminals of the last decade accountable which I see a 0% chance from any of the other candidates including AOC

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

    I don’t think he can run against AOC, AES and AOC draw from the same pools of progressive campaign workers and ground supporters and these pools are not large enough to support two anti establishment presidential campaigns. As much as AOC tries to be part of the establishment, the establishment does not trust her and will treat her presidential run with hostility

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 14 points 7 hours ago

    Your analysis rings true for me. I disagree with the majority of his politics obviously, but I'd vote for him over AOC because he at least has integrity. Even when the DSA is backing him, he's not dishonestly chasing their vote by pretending to be a socialist and I can extract narrow policy goals from a generic social democrat. She lied to defend the genocide he's against. Anyone shameless enough to tell that lie and not leave public life afterward is such an unhinged sociopath that I don't want them having any elected office. Being an open antizionist is such a litmus test for me trusting any politician, one that almost every other democrat fails right out the gate. AOC's Gaza denialism will destroy her in the primary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 hours ago

    I think he will run in 2032 after a solid senate term and i think he will crush it. If the '28 Dem candidate wins it could offset my prediction by an election and itll happen in 2036.

    I have major political disagreements with El-Sayed, of course, but he has done an impressive job of bridging the Harris and Bernie wings of the Dems by way of an Obama endorsement. We will see where DSA sits with him when he runs, anyone to the left of that will probably still be irrelevant to US politics.

  • source
  • parent