Seriously, should these words even exist? I don’t think so. I prefer to say “Normal” person over “Atheist” person or “Nonbeliever” person.

The word “Atheism” denotes a negation of theism, but in reality, that negation of theism is what all newborns start with. That is the default behavior; that is the normal behavior. I never saw a Chimp at zoo going to Sunday Schools.

It is us, the human society in general, who dump this theism BS on kids, at an age when they can't even reason by themselves (pretty convenient age to try to convince and convert eh?)

For context, my Dad has always been a skeptic, and as he became old, he started to be a hardcore agnostic - so I was never brought up in a family of faith (thankfully) - and so I never had to struggle with any “deconstruction”, as some of us had to. All my encounters with religion has been while interacting with my peers, colleagues and neighbors. To me, growing up without any faith was totally normal, because that's how I happened to be raised. And by the time I encountered religion, I already had enough cognitive capacity to recognize and reject that as BS.

Enough ramblings, but my point is that theists brought in a claim (about invisible Sky Daddy) that can't be proven, so the burden of proof stays with them. We don't have to “negate” a fiction. I dislike the word “Atheist” (although I respect the intended purpose of that in this present time), but I still prefer to say we are “normal”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 16 hours ago

people get wierd with language. I have athiests saying all agnostics are athiests and vice versa. its kinda true but its a matter of magnitude. Many of these things don't make sense in the strictest literal sense but we basically know what people mean by societal context. also some use it in ways were it can be a bit different. When I was agnostic I knew an athiest who believed in ghosts. this did not make sense to me but to him the term was only about religion and not all supernatural stuff. At that time I identified as agnostic because for me the existence of god or whatever was a 50/50 shot. To me it could as equally be assuming you don't start getting into specifics. I identify as athiest now because I feel the chances of any kind of supernatural thing being so remote as to be zero. less than getting hit by lightening right after you won the lottery while an extinction level asteroid was hitting the earth and a gamma ray burst was blasting our solar system.

  • source