this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026

418 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,137 readers

14,632 active

3,526 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

“No human at the helm”: Delaware plan would let AI agents run entire businesses. Owners of AI-run firms would evade liability for “reckless” AI, US Rep. Comer says. (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by eicker@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nanometer1625 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The quote used as the title of the article isn't accurate. The owner of the company would still be a human, so there would be a human at the helm.

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

I think he ment a human culpable for the actions of the company?

Which is strange since we don't hold executives accountable in any meaningful way.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

When is a human ever culpable for the actions of a company?

parent