you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

NATO was arming and proxifying them already, but Georgia is too small and not suicidal enough for a long war.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago* (2 children)

    Nothing about Georgia makes it un-suicidal, and combat in the mountains means you don't need quite as big a heap of men. Georgia simply was not armed & trained in the same way or timetable that they managed in Ukraine. Whether that was CIA arrogance or a lesser political commitment--you can decide. They got it right on the second try though. And Russia learned the exact opposite wrong lesson.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Georgia was also not as marinated in nationalism, so the general population was not willing to fight, so after losing the initial battles the leadership was forced to negotiate, while Ukraine has a strong fascist presence, who are able to lock the country on the full speed course into the iceberg.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment