this is post is based on a conversation i had with someone about whether we positively connect our anarchism to democracy or not, because on one hand the democratic ideal, of everyone being in power and making decisions together is pretty neat and anarchist, and that's also what many people think of when they hear democracy, but then democracies (as in democratic organisations and states) since the greek inception of the word also have almost exclusively been the ruling of a privileged few over the rest, with just enought power (or illusion of power) handed back to us that we wouldnt rebel. as one argument goes: if "democracy" literally means "rulership of the people" then who are the people?

sadly we did not kiss after the conversation :<
but i think we agreed that honestly either is fine ฅ^>⩊<^ฅ

and now: me rambling about anarchy :3if you are wondering now "anarchy? isnt that when everyone just does whatever they want and fucks everyone else over?? isnt that just destructive chaos?"

then well, that is one definition of anarchy but it is not the anarchy that anarchists desire ;3

anarchy as anarchists understand it is a society organizing itself by anarchist principles. this expesses itself through things such as mutual aide, free association, absence or minimalization of hierarchies and direct action.

basically people getting together in all areas of their lives, to together fulfill their needs, help each other, make decisions among those affected and resolve conflicts together. it's ofc not always glamourus, no society is, but we believe that it is a better way of living and organizing and we can start building it here and now by just doing those things

important values of anarchy are equality, freedom, solidarity, consent, and uniqueness. those are also shared (or claimed to be shared) by other political movements and organizations, but i would argue that most put other things first such as upholding the current system, maintaining and extending the rulers power and such.

ofc not all anarchists think alike so at the end of the day this is just one perspective out of many

if u are intrigued now and wanna hear more about anarchism, you could check out the anarchist faq or ask in the comments but pws don't be mean

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

That I haven't managed to fly yet is merely evidence that I just need to flap a bit harder

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

    The alternative systems aggregate all political power in singular offices, which hasn't always been the best thing for we, the peasantry. It worked out pretty well for the Soviet Union, until Stalin started being a dick. Worked out pretty well for Yugoslavia as well, until Tito died and then there was a genocide immediately took place. Democracy isn't perfect, but it's the system with the most backsies

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 17 hours ago

    i mean, the system i strife for is anarchy, which spreads power even wider than democracy which really just aggregates it in a few more people than a dictatorship.

    whether it is an alternative to democracy or just it's truest form is the question of the meme. i think it is definitely an better alternative to our current systems though and the main one we should be measuring them against when criticising.

    we can't improve by only comparing to those we deem worse and saying "at least we have it better"

  • source
  • parent