▲ 522 ▼ CEO says COVID gave us bad habits, prescribes unemployment of 40-50% (twitter.com) submitted 3 years ago by riley0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml 151 comments fedilink hide all child comments Property developer and CEO Tim Gurner: "We need to see unemployment rise. Unemployment has to jump 40, 50 percent in my view. We need to see pain in the economy. We need to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around."
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 1 point 3 years ago (6 children) How was agriculture sabotaged? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) I can find a article fomer cia agents talking about how they did it. They would det fields on fire, break important farm equipment stuff like thst. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was that enough to turn the country into a net importer? I thought the general mismanagement was the bigger problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago (3 children) General mismanagement? They went from a feudal dirt based monarchy to the first spacefairing civilization in a lifetime. Their management was far better than ours. We just had a head start and the power to do more evil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) And yet China managed to survive. Of course there are external factors but it's important to know which internal decisions could have led to success. Processors, internet, renewable energy, etc. Maybe winning the space race prevented success in other areas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Stalin should not have stopped till the sea. China is willing to do what it takes to win. They have cut deals with evil countries to get resources to allow them to become the next hegemony. The US might never have stayed on top for quite some time if China had not seized the means of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop. But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) I can find a article fomer cia agents talking about how they did it. They would det fields on fire, break important farm equipment stuff like thst. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was that enough to turn the country into a net importer? I thought the general mismanagement was the bigger problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago (3 children) General mismanagement? They went from a feudal dirt based monarchy to the first spacefairing civilization in a lifetime. Their management was far better than ours. We just had a head start and the power to do more evil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) And yet China managed to survive. Of course there are external factors but it's important to know which internal decisions could have led to success. Processors, internet, renewable energy, etc. Maybe winning the space race prevented success in other areas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Stalin should not have stopped till the sea. China is willing to do what it takes to win. They have cut deals with evil countries to get resources to allow them to become the next hegemony. The US might never have stayed on top for quite some time if China had not seized the means of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop. But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (4 children) Was that enough to turn the country into a net importer? I thought the general mismanagement was the bigger problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago (3 children) General mismanagement? They went from a feudal dirt based monarchy to the first spacefairing civilization in a lifetime. Their management was far better than ours. We just had a head start and the power to do more evil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) And yet China managed to survive. Of course there are external factors but it's important to know which internal decisions could have led to success. Processors, internet, renewable energy, etc. Maybe winning the space race prevented success in other areas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Stalin should not have stopped till the sea. China is willing to do what it takes to win. They have cut deals with evil countries to get resources to allow them to become the next hegemony. The US might never have stayed on top for quite some time if China had not seized the means of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop. But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago (3 children) General mismanagement? They went from a feudal dirt based monarchy to the first spacefairing civilization in a lifetime. Their management was far better than ours. We just had a head start and the power to do more evil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) And yet China managed to survive. Of course there are external factors but it's important to know which internal decisions could have led to success. Processors, internet, renewable energy, etc. Maybe winning the space race prevented success in other areas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Stalin should not have stopped till the sea. China is willing to do what it takes to win. They have cut deals with evil countries to get resources to allow them to become the next hegemony. The US might never have stayed on top for quite some time if China had not seized the means of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop. But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) And yet China managed to survive. Of course there are external factors but it's important to know which internal decisions could have led to success. Processors, internet, renewable energy, etc. Maybe winning the space race prevented success in other areas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Stalin should not have stopped till the sea. China is willing to do what it takes to win. They have cut deals with evil countries to get resources to allow them to become the next hegemony. The US might never have stayed on top for quite some time if China had not seized the means of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop. But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) Stalin should not have stopped till the sea. China is willing to do what it takes to win. They have cut deals with evil countries to get resources to allow them to become the next hegemony. The US might never have stayed on top for quite some time if China had not seized the means of production permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop. But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago The atomic bomb, Stalin had to stop. But that suggests that capitalistic meddling brought the sovjet union down. The primary question should be how the sovjet union could have kept the lead. permalink fedilink source parent