you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not 150 miles each - 150 in total over the course of about four days.

Take-home message appears to be that bikes get about twice as good every decade from the 1900s through to about the late 1980s, and then about 10% better every decade since then. They're somewhat dodgy and dangerous until the 1950s introduce fairly standard steel frame geometry and back derailleurs. 1980s introduces standard sizes for groupsets which massively improves general rideability. Since then, it's been general improvements in material technology and attention-to-detail rather than anything particularly ground-breaking.

I've a 'seventies bike' for cool, but it is a lot of work, and a couple of 2000's bikes that are actually useful workhorses, so that tracks.

Cool video, comrade. Thanks!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    I think the last big jumps would've been give or take 2010 with LED Technology making bike lights so much less power hungry and brighter and obviously battery technology that gives you the e-bike

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Since then, it's been general improvements in material technology and attention-to-detail rather than anything particularly ground-breaking.

    The attention-to-detail aspect of device design is so important. A lot of aspects of the design of bikes could have been implemented 100 years ago, but it simply took a long time to try out lots of different permutations and figure out the best way to do things. Things like thru-axles, or universal derailuer hangers. Bikes from the 80s are totally rideable (I use one as a city bike), but they're definately mechanically quirky and annoying compared to something even a decade newer.

    There are a lot of devices and mechanism out there that would benefit from the nit-picky development that bikes have received over the decades. It's distressing when you see modern versions of a device that have somehow regressed.

  • source
  • parent