Technology

hideshow 11 child comments

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 69 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No. Keep him. Hemorrhage more money. Go bankrupt. Zuck can become destitute, homeless, depressed, and addicted to opioids before an untimely death. He will not be mourned.

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

Exactly, never inturupt your enemy when they are making a mistake.

parent

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 1 point 3 days ago

I cant what for them to try to argue meta's loss would do any harm to society

parent

[–] Arsecroft@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 4 days ago* (6 children)

they cant get rid of him, lol

he's gonna run it aground at full speed

he'll be fine though

edit: in his underground bunker lair thing

hideshow 6 child comments

parent

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

Connect the air intake of his bunker to a septic system. Let that fucker literally drown in shit

parent

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 days ago

he's gonna run it aground at full speed

Please move fast and break the thing

parent

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)

they cant get rid of him, lol

Well not with that attitude.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Mario theme intensifies

parent

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 days ago (1 child)

If they don't get rid of him, they are liable to investor lawsuits.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

How do you get rid of someone with 60% voting shares?

parent

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

That's s good thing