We've been getting a lot of AI coded submissions recently, as well as lots of reports asking to remove them.

Should we remove these posts, or not?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Depends on the definition. If we go by the definition a lot of users here seem to have, Linux itself would no longer be considered a FOSS project, which imo is completely ridiculous.

If we're talking about literally vibe coded from the ground up projects where the devs don't even know what the code inside looks like, yes maybe it should be removed or given a post tag once we have the feature.

Personally I prefer to keep a discussion going even with heavy AI coded projects, we're living in interesting times and I am convinced to keep an open mind about what engineering will look like going forward and what doors it might open for the FOSS community despite its flaws and negatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago*

    There is no definition of "AI". It's all bullshit. It doesn't exist.

    The supposed difference between these two unstated definitions is a difference of scale not of kind. There is no objective dividing line for moderation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 22 hours ago

    As others have said in other posts, the cat's out of the bag. No matter if/when/how bad the AI crash is, if computing is still viable after then there will be AI.

    I think eventually it will emerge that the highest quality AI code will be produced by already experienced developers, who can identify when it's produced slop and fix it, and that will be the case no matter how good the models get.

    I of think of it somewhat like managing a team of interns. You give them instructions and they give you code. You still have to know enough to identify if that code meets the requirements and is of good quality.

  • source
  • parent