More Blind Lunacy.

This place has got some serious right wing nut job vibes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 days ago* (5 children)

I’m sorry, what is this supposed to be?

Quick Edit: Oh it’s blind! I pity anyone who feels the need to look at Blind. I read it as a descriptor, “blind lunacy”

What is “White House & Policy,” why does it say “slync[dot]io” under it?

A shocking number of people seem to think this is from a White House account, but there’s no real source.

What is “this place”?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    It might be. It’s certainly in tune with maga.

    This post trying to shift the language. Words matter.

    Women’s liberation is exactly what it says. We were legally tied to men, dependent due to legal issues, up until the 1970s. Due to only 50 years of liberation in which we had to fight against significant societal inertia for while, well, a subset of males are still flailing after that shift, not knowing what to do or how to identify themselves after losing their life crutch shaped like a human being, specifically, a woman. Fueled by the prior generation, their dads, grandpas, and uncles, saying: women weren't like this back in my day. An honest statement, because we weren’t financially liberated from men and that creates a certain level of dependence that, by necessity, changes behavior.

    Anyway. Using the word “family” while avoiding the use of the word “woman” is an attempt to erase women from the thought process regarding the 19th amendment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago*

    It might be.

    This could have been posted by someone in a different country, or even an LLM. Blind is anonymous and therefore useless. It’s been a joke in tech for over a decade now. You can sometimes get real information but it’s not often.

    This post trying to shift the language. Words matter.

    Words do matter. This post is garbage spewed by no one. It could even be a fake screenshot. 

    Sources matter just as much as words do. You’re giving a screenshot far too much power when it has no source.

    It’s alarming how many people upvoted this meaningless Blind post, because people get caught up in the drama instead of realizing what they’re responding to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Did you not notice it ends in "taking away single men's right to vote"?

    It might be public policy I can get behind, but it's a shitpost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago

    A. I am triggered by any talk that brushes up against rolling back any piece of women’s liberation.

    B. I’m just off a long work stretch of 12s and engaged in not moving from where I woke while viewing crap on my phone right now.

    C. This is the Internet.

  • source
  • parent