▲ 32 ▼ Linux kernel goes full AI slop code, hides chatbot commits (pivot-to-ai.com) submitted 2 days ago by dgerard@awful.systems [M] to c/techtakes@awful.systems 21 comments fedilink hide all child comments ‘The kernel project only wants serious developers. That includes having access to enough resources to function in this world’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9ARF2KcDgc&list=UU9rJrMVgcXTfa8xuMnbhAEA&index=1&pp=iAQBsAgC - video https://pivottoai.libsyn.com/20261014-linux-kernel-goes-full-ai-slop-code-hides-chatbot-commits - podcast time: 13 min 43 sec
[+] auzy1@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] self@awful.systems 3 points 6 hours ago (1 child) anyway since we’re here (well, you’re not but fuck you) here’s your pissboy programming god’s latest: https://mas.to/@zzt/117452262149452021 enjoy! go fuck yourself! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] diz@awful.systems 1 point 19 minutes ago* Regarding it being a compiler, I can get behind that: no compiler artifacts in the repo, lol. edit: in fact I'm pretty sure if they were putting compiler-generated assembly into the repository, which is awful and you shouldn't do that, they would keep information what compiler shat them out. I can see in some 5..10 years, deterministic coding tool that either converts specification to code or asks for clarification and then edits said specification to disambiguate. One way flow, generated artifacts kept out of the repos. That's not gonna even begin to happen until the bubble pops though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] self@awful.systems 3 points 6 hours ago you kids are so fucking desperate for your programming god to not suck permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 3 points 6 hours ago (1 child) anyway since we’re here (well, you’re not but fuck you) here’s your pissboy programming god’s latest: https://mas.to/@zzt/117452262149452021 enjoy! go fuck yourself! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] diz@awful.systems 1 point 19 minutes ago* Regarding it being a compiler, I can get behind that: no compiler artifacts in the repo, lol. edit: in fact I'm pretty sure if they were putting compiler-generated assembly into the repository, which is awful and you shouldn't do that, they would keep information what compiler shat them out. I can see in some 5..10 years, deterministic coding tool that either converts specification to code or asks for clarification and then edits said specification to disambiguate. One way flow, generated artifacts kept out of the repos. That's not gonna even begin to happen until the bubble pops though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] diz@awful.systems 1 point 19 minutes ago* Regarding it being a compiler, I can get behind that: no compiler artifacts in the repo, lol. edit: in fact I'm pretty sure if they were putting compiler-generated assembly into the repository, which is awful and you shouldn't do that, they would keep information what compiler shat them out. I can see in some 5..10 years, deterministic coding tool that either converts specification to code or asks for clarification and then edits said specification to disambiguate. One way flow, generated artifacts kept out of the repos. That's not gonna even begin to happen until the bubble pops though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] self@awful.systems 3 points 6 hours ago you kids are so fucking desperate for your programming god to not suck permalink fedilink source parent