you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 hours ago (3 children)

Compute is the bottleneck for AI, not labor. Linux was able to develop more because of the labor being done by huge number of people for free and from those employed by other companies working on it. If AI keeps accelerating on the same trajectory, there is little reason to hope for it to get better as the models get larger and training costs get higher


The Luddites were not just smashing machines, they had a list of demands they were trying to build pressure for. They were also trying to get the rights for unions, strikes, abolishing child labor, minimum wages and the things like that which shifted powers back into the favor of workers. They had tried petitioning governments for that for a while before they started smashing things


If the US bans open-weight models, you don't think a large number of countries would be heavily pressured by industry to do the same?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    What part of distributed systems are you still struggling with here? Also, models are getting incredibly more efficient every few months. Qwen 3.8 that runs on a laptop today is comparable to Opus 4.6 from around half a year ago which needed a whole data centre.

    People working on local models don't need to compete with whatever the big corps are doing, they just need to make tools that are good enough to use on your machine. Just the same way Linux didn't have to do everything Windows did to become usable.

    And yeah, Luddites had lists of demands just you do, how's that work out for them?

    And if the US somehow did ban open models, I'm sure the vassals would as well, but again who gives a fuck? The whole west is like 13% of the global population. And it's imploding economically and politically in real time. Who cares what goes on in this genocidal cesspool?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments