▲ 1944 ▼ I never understood this logic (lemmy.sdf.org) submitted 3 years ago by seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org to c/memes@lemmy.ml 177 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 10 points 3 years ago (2 children) Where? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) America and it already passed in 2021 to be effective 2025 source: https://www.kbb.com/car-news/new-law-will-require-in-car-breathalyzers/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago In the other article linked by that one it says it's just a recommendation. Seems weird. A federal advisory board recommended yesterday that safety regulators require “alcohol impairment detection systems to be included in all new vehicles.” The move is just a recommendation, but it has the weight of law behind it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] boonhet@lemm.ee -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) EU. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Yadaran@feddit.de 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lmfao not at all permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago They ended up requiring only ease of installation but it's definitely something that was on the cards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Source? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago My bad, they only ended up mandating ease of breathalyzer installation https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12799-Road-safety-easy-installation-of-alcohol-interlocks-in-vehicles_en permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) America and it already passed in 2021 to be effective 2025 source: https://www.kbb.com/car-news/new-law-will-require-in-car-breathalyzers/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago In the other article linked by that one it says it's just a recommendation. Seems weird. A federal advisory board recommended yesterday that safety regulators require “alcohol impairment detection systems to be included in all new vehicles.” The move is just a recommendation, but it has the weight of law behind it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 3 years ago In the other article linked by that one it says it's just a recommendation. Seems weird. A federal advisory board recommended yesterday that safety regulators require “alcohol impairment detection systems to be included in all new vehicles.” The move is just a recommendation, but it has the weight of law behind it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] boonhet@lemm.ee -6 points 3 years ago (2 children) EU. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Yadaran@feddit.de 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lmfao not at all permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago They ended up requiring only ease of installation but it's definitely something that was on the cards. permalink fedilink source parent [–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Source? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago My bad, they only ended up mandating ease of breathalyzer installation https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12799-Road-safety-easy-installation-of-alcohol-interlocks-in-vehicles_en permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yadaran@feddit.de 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lmfao not at all permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago They ended up requiring only ease of installation but it's definitely something that was on the cards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago They ended up requiring only ease of installation but it's definitely something that was on the cards. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Source? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago My bad, they only ended up mandating ease of breathalyzer installation https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12799-Road-safety-easy-installation-of-alcohol-interlocks-in-vehicles_en permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago My bad, they only ended up mandating ease of breathalyzer installation https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12799-Road-safety-easy-installation-of-alcohol-interlocks-in-vehicles_en permalink fedilink source parent
