you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

Calling people names to try and discredit them is not an effective way of communicating why toxic foods seemingly don't exist or whatever it is you're trying to say. In this day and age of so much information at our fingertips you have to want to stay ignorant of food toxins. I wish I could say that being that way would only hurt oneself but that mentality allows poor food quality to persist across the industry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

    If it walks like a duck... You can stay ignorant of food science if you choose but food "toxins" is a term almost exclusively used by quacks and grifters. Listen to people that have been trained, went to school, and have a degree in food/dietary science instead. It's probably a lot more boring, and doesn't confirm your biases as much, but has the advantage of being factual and true. You also won't fall for bullshit and buy into possibly dangerous woo, that can hurt you, to magically "get rid of toxins" too.

    This weird food rabbit hole you've gone down to convince yourself of "food toxins" is almost assuredly an echo chamber of bullshit. I'm asking you very nicely, with kid gloves on, to actually go out to a library and read a book about actual food science instead of engaging with influencers and social media about it. I think you'll find out pretty quickly that they're all full shit and should be ignored.

  • source
  • parent