I've recently played Resident Evil 6 for the 1st time after playing Resident Evil 4 (an absolute masterpiece) & Resident 5 (a pretty good game). I was already aware of the hate this game got over the years. But after experiencing it, it's only bad in an artificial way. Like yeah, it's nothing like the classic games and it's too much in the action category.

Otherwise, as someone who loves action games, it's a pretty fun game. Especially in Mercenaries Mode, where it's fun to mow down body-horror themed enemies. As a Resident Evil game, it's pretty bad. But...as an action third person shooter with splatter punks, it's quite well executed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 1 week ago (18 children)

I really like the 90s Romeo and Juliet, set in present day with the lines unchanged (mostly). I'm alone in this, I think.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    I’m alone in this

    Alone with every single girl coming of age in the 90s who swooned over it cuz of Leo "Heartthrob" DiCaprio.

    I skipped it back in the day but my gf made me watch it last year and I liked it. Very stylish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    He was actually annoying in it I felt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Weirdly, I think that is a strength of his performance. Romeo is a misunderstood character: people associate him with romance and chivalry when the Romeo from the play is obsessive, fickle, and impulsive. Kind of a dweeb, really. Juliet fails to see through his bullshit because she is so, so young.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    That was huge when it came out. Pretty much everyone I knew loved it. I think it only started getting shit on recently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    I got so much shit for liking it, maybe it was just my school though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    I'm sure there were people who didn't enjoy it (as can be seen in this thread haha), but even though we didn't have wikipedia to check at the time I think it was generally known to be big. And checking the stats it opened to box office #1 and then made 10x its budget, and the critics mostly liked it.

    Anyway, it fortunately endures as a triumph for basically anyone who appreciates lit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    It was alright but the fact that they didn't modernize the language is what ruined the film for me. Who the hell spoke like that in the 90s? It made no sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    That's... that's the point. It's Shakespeare's words given modern visual elements to make it more comprehensible by a modern audience. It's the prose of Romeo And Juliet that make it Shakespeare, not the swords and doublets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (4 children)

    Yeah and as someone who hated Shakespeare back in my grade school days (and still does), I couldn't care less about that. I simply want to see a modern take on his plays with the script translated to a prose that I can actually understand.

    As someone with ADHD, it's difficult enough as-is to focus on words on a page written in a modern dialect, let alone an ancient one! Canterbury Tales was an even worse time for me because of this. I have to be fully invested in the story, or I can't understand a damn thing in these old manuscripts because my brain refuses to pay attention to anything that isn't urgent, interesting, or novel to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago

    As someone with ADHD, it’s difficult enough as-is to focus on words on a page written in a modern dialect

    This kinda comes off as someone with red-green color blindness wondering why more paintings aren't done with primarily blues and yellows.

    I guess if you want modern language you could always watch West Side Story.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Are you aware you're asking for something that cannot exist? If you don't have the Shakespearean prose, it's not Shakespeare. It's the identifying element of the thing. You can bend and stretch many aspects of a work, but you can't remove the identifying elements. For poets, like Shakespeare, their word choice is core to the identity of the work. The 'story' is almost meaningless.

    e.g. Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening and Loveliest of Trees have the same 'story,' a man takes a moment to appreciate the aesthetic qualities of a treed landscape in winter, but one would never say they were the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Why not? If religious people can update the Bible translations to use modern English, why can't we do the same with non-religious texts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Because the goals are different. They aren't trying to share the poetry of the various original authors of the bible. They are trying to share the stories of the christian mythos to enable/convince people to be christians. We can create things like a movie from a book or translate a book/movie and somewhat call it the same thing (though, even then, it also somewhat isn't) because the story/plot is the identity of the thing and word choice is considered secondary, but in poetry, so much of what makes a poem itself comes down to individual words and punctuation marks, changing one can be significant, let alone changing the entire text.

  • source
  • parent