Smooth Dunk | Bluesky

Transcript3 panel comic

Panel 1: Red Guy in t-shirt is sitting at a desk being interviewed. He says “AI is going to kill us all”

Panel 2: Interviewer looking directly into camera, says “Well, we’ve heard from the anti-Ai guy. Now let’s hear from the CEO of AI

Panel 3: Wide shot revealing the second interviewee looking slightly confused. He says “I’m the Anti-AI guy”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 4 days ago (7 children)

It took 8 months after blacklisting Anthropic for the Pentagon to stop using Claude, as an example of how embedded AI has become in a few years. The Skynet scenario is very much on the table. But that's the crust on the layer-cake of possible disaster scenarios. I dunno about humanity-ending, but wide-scale disaster could happen in a lot of less dramatic ways just from system disruptions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    But how is this different from when the H-bomb came out, or how people felt about the automobile? They thought going too fast would kill the occupants.

    People have repeatedly warned that women's rights would end society.

    We're VERY prone to claiming new technology will kill everyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    To be fair, the atom bombs still might, and automobiles do kill over a million people a year. But you're right, we have a tendency to catastrophize when it comes to new tech. That said, I still think this tech is different. Or perhaps more accurately, it comes with a hybrid of up and down sides that we haven't really dealt with before. To be clear, I don't think we're going extinct. Man, I got into a sentence structure rhythm there, huh?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago (2 children)

    The Skynet scenario is very much on the table.

    No, it's not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    What makes you say that? Other than the time travel, of course.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago
    1. It's fiction. Nothing in fiction is ever complex enough to accurately convey a real life situation. Doing so ignores many important aspects of the latter for no good reason.

    2. Llms aren't sentient and never will be. Any catastrophe that comes about through the use of these programs is due to the intent or negligence of the human using it. Saying that's identical to a fictional robot uprising against humanity is foolish and only serves to legitimize the lies being spread to enrich the people pushing them.

  • source
  • parent