371
Bitwarden Switches to Commercial License (community.bitwarden.com)
submitted 1 day ago* by to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

RyanL Bitwarden Employee

Hello everyone!

Starting in the next release, the Bitwarden apps published to the various stores will be the commercially licensed builds. No action is needed, and the apps will work exactly as they do today.

Bitwarden remains committed to open source security and transparency
The GPLv3 OSS licensed version continues to be updated and published on GitHub
All current features are available in both versions
License details are on GitHub
Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone

If you have any questions, please ask them in this thread. Thanks all!

EDIT:

Bitwarden is not going closed-source
You can still fork Bitwarden
No change to self-hosting, the licensing change affects those who are repackaging and reselling Bitwarden
The free plan is here to stay permanently
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I've been very happy with Vaultwarden+Keyguard

https://keyguard.dev/

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago*

    It currently doesn't work with Vaultwarden. The Linux client doesn't accept custom certificates. And the Android client is paid. It is a dead-end for self-hosting.

    The license is also stupidly a single sentence. Which means that use could be nuked at any minute, and any money you use to pay the developer means nothing. If they wanted to kill the project today and nuke the repo, you have no legal rights, the project dies and fuck you and your passwords. That doesn't exactly inspires confidence.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

    But that's not Foss, so I didn't consider it

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    It is free and open-source on Desktop at this moment.

    Keyguard is a commercial app and unlocking a premium funds its further development and supports me (Artem Chepurnyi) directly. As of right now, only the Android builds distributed via Google Play store have main features locked behind a paywall, other distribution channels have a build with everything unlocked.

    Source: https://keyguard.dev/docs/premium/

    But it makes sense to pay for it, since Bitwarden is a constantly changing system and these projects based on it must always be up-to-date with their API changes, too. This is time and worry consuming, and should be compensated.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 18 hours ago* (1 child)

    License is: all rights reserved.

    That's free like in beer, and open like 'allowed to inspect' that's not what most people mean when they talk of Foss.

    source: https://github.com/AChep/keyguard-app/blob/master/LICENSE

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago*

    Roger that. Thank you for the clarification that you meant the actual term, and not just the fact of no mandatory payment and it having an the source available for public.

    I get what you mean, yet frankly, I do not believe such projects may be always free that are supposed to always be up-to-date for another system they have no official relation to, and keep it as a responsible hobby other people depend on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    Thank you very much for the awesome project mentioned! I had no idea about it!
    The marvel works great with Vaultwarden, too, it seems!

    Though, Bitwarden system/clients are not so featureful as KeePassXC, for example, it's a great alternative for a more adequate synchronization.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent