I’m very much a luddite when it comes to AI, I’m unequivocally against its usage and development. The social and environmental costs AI incurs and proposes to incur are overwhelming. The celebration of AI with Chinese characteristics is often justified by the idea that AI can be useful, and the reason why it’s OK to be vehemently against it otherwise but support it when it’s being implemented by China is because AI can only be a force for evil within the capitalist framework. I agree with the latter point obviously but find it hard to accept that China driving AI advancement is a good thing for the world.

I don’t want to have a debate about whether China is a revisionist state, but I think we can all agree that China has refused to take the role of the Soviet Union in exporting socialism to the world. What happens when it exports AI to countries world over that very much operate within a capitalist framework while China does nothing to advance world wide socialism?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 12 hours ago*

There is no value to AI as I far as I can tell,

This is such nonsense, it basically slaughtered the whole data entry industry which was a giant bottleneck to many projects. It speeds up programming workloads to an extreme degree. You can keep saying its useless but it simply isn't true, it is useful and that is why so many countries, including communist China, are adopting it. You are basically saying that applied statistics has no value. What?!

  • source
  • parent