you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 4 days ago (14 children)

The answer will come when seeing how the world responds if a Dem wins. Trump reminds me of the Bush administration and how the world was seemingly pushing against American hegemony until Obama came into office. Same with Trump 1 after Biden came in. If a Dem gets elected and the anti-American sentiments remain strong than it’ll show the amount of damage the administration has done. Otherwise he’s just a villain of the year.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Do the Dems have another Obama ready to go though? Seems like they only have the regular cabinet of uncharismatic ghouls, they don't have someone who can even pretend to promise America will be different this time baby, I swear!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    True but I think they can find someone in 2 years. I think AOC will probably be it and radlibs will push each other out of the way in their hurry to vote for her. I remember during the Kamala fiasco seeing people on a discord I was on say they'd vote for her to get a female president to "check that box". It's all one big game to them. So I think it'll be AOCIA and it will absolutely mollify US libs (and a few self-identified socialists who should know better).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Yes, in the minds of some liberals (probably many actually) a country with a black/woman or both leader cannot be evil or imperialist. Just like my parents scuffed at Biden but had no issue with either Obama or Hillary for no other reason that "well he's black" or "omg a democratically elected woman". Truly insane people. I wonder what will happen if Kim Jung Ae takes an official role in DPRK, their heads will probably explode.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Nothing, the neoliberal media will write 100,000 articles about how she's the "princess" of the "despotic ruling family" and the libs will nod sagely along, unbothered by any troubling thoughts of cognitive dissonance the next time they get horny for a Michelle / Malia / Sasha or a Hillary / Chelsea royal flush - saving all their energy for a scowl and a magnificent "aw shucks" shrug when you ask them about the Bushes or the Kennedys.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    You cannot change the past but you can make the future And anyone who tells you different is a fucking lethargic devil I don't look at a few token Latinos and black people in the public eye As some type of achievement for my people as a whole Most of those successful individuals are just sell-outs and house Negros

    But, I don't consider brothers a sell-out if they move out of the ghetto Poverty has nothing to do with our people It's not in our culture to be poor That's only been the last five hundred years of our history Look at the last two thousand years of our existence And what we brought to the world in terms of science, mathematics Agriculture and forms of government

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 4 days ago*

    I think the re-election of the Trump admin after an interregnum of "reasonable liberal governance" dealt a terminal blow to the idea that American electoralism fundamentally moderates the USA's behavior. And because Trump is throwing shit everywhere, other countries can't help but gain some first-hand experience of the downsides of that situation, and will act accordingly.

    Also, the USA's internal cultural landscape is fracturing, and there is no-longer an implicit coordinate between the USA's cultural exports, and the goals of the USA's political leadership. And so, even if the USA remains a cultural export juggernaut (I think it will), that aspect of it's soft power will no longer be such a direct tool for it's leadership. And so I expect that the USA will become a lot more hard-edged in the way it interacts with the rest of the world, simply because the cultural influences will not subtly steer other country's decision making towards outcomes that the USA favors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 4 days ago

    US hegemony is basically over at this point. The country is completely unstable and no one is gonna be able to hold meaningful power for more than 4 years at a time. The US is going to continue flailing around and lashing out, getting weaker and weaker every time. On top of that, American industry is so completely gutted out and the economy is based entirely on moving money from one excel sheet to another.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    god remember how Obama won the nobel peace prize in 2009 simply for not being Bush? even tho he didn't do much of anything by that point and continued most of his worst foreign policies. godawful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    I could easily see imperialist leaders rallying around a decorum dem, but I can't see the public doing it in the same way as before unless it's a serious reformist (like actually doing substantial reforms, not doing lip service and then nothing substantial). Admittedly, I was pretty apolitical/uninformed during the Bush years, but based on what I've picked up about it, this situation seems pretty different even if there are some similarities. For one, China is rising in a way that the empire has been unable to stop. The empire has tried to make Iran kneel and is getting kicked out of the Middle East in the process, which also involved using a lot of arms that are hard to replace, if not impossible depending on the access to rare earth materials that they can achieve - and as I understand it, some of it is locked behind China, who is not going to want to hand them over just so the empire can attack more people. Similar has been happening for years with Russia and NATO-Ukraine. Lot of weapons used, Russia is still standing and taking the slow and steady approach to whittling down the regime's territorial power, which is also weakening NATO-EU indirectly.

    And this is not even getting into the internal problems with the US. The attempted gutting of federal that is hard to undo, especially without serious changes to administrative mindset. The statements implying that Trump may not even cede power if the votes say he has lost. The decaying infrastructure. The poor/lacking internal industry, due to so much outsourcing over decades. The shit going on with ICE, flock cameras, data centers. And all of this while climate change gradually gets worse, which means more intense and more frequent weather events.

    Oh and that's not even mentioning the specter of fuel costs, which could balloon even while Trump is still in office, with them continuing to pull from limited reserves and refusing to find a resolution with Iran.

    In other words, I don't see how there would be a perception of a "return to normal" at this point without substantial changes in the material. Hell, I don't know if we will even reach a "normal" 2028 election without chaos/unrest first. If fuel costs get out of control, that could break things in a way that no propaganda can smooth over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Yeah, there won't be any "return to normal". The US is now as "normal" as it will ever be going forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments