you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 4 days ago (15 children)

Greasy beading that sloughs off the chicken immediately isn't good by any metric, fast food or otherwise.

They also went to the supreme court so they could determine the healthcare their employees get. Company is rotten

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 days ago (14 children)

    Greasy beading that sloughs off the chicken immediately isn’t good by any metric, fast food or otherwise.

    Ok buddy, but:

    1. That's not the norm, and remember, this is in comparison to other fastfood options.

    2. If you're boycotting them, how do you know that's what it's like?

    But most importantly:

    Company is rotten

    I said every corporation sucks...

    That includes chicfila...

    They also went to the supreme court so they could determine the healthcare their employees get.

    Not sure why you expect people to know what you're referring too...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 days ago (11 children)

    No, that is the norm. And has been for years.

    Occasionally for work functions, someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything.

    Why go to bat for this shitty food?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago (8 children)

    So you’ve never eaten it and are judging it as bad food?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    Apparently reading comprehension is not a required skill to be a chikfila shill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (6 children)

    It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything.

    You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children)

    Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good?

    Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense.

    Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Why go to bat for this shitty food?

    Why are you ignoring how bad everything else is?

    Hell, look at what McDonald's gives trump...

    But for fucks sake man, when someone says "every corporation is bad" they're not defending any of them...

    I have no idea why you can't understand that, but I'm sure as shit not hanging around for a miracle and I really don't care if it finally clicked or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment