▲ 112 ▼ Chick-fil-A takes a stand against fast-food drive-thru AI trend (www.fox5atlanta.com) submitted 4 days ago by Mustachius_Grumpius to c/technology@lemmy.world 103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago (8 children) So you’ve never eaten it and are judging it as bad food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -4 points 3 days ago (7 children) Apparently reading comprehension is not a required skill to be a chikfila shill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (6 children) It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -4 points 3 days ago (7 children) Apparently reading comprehension is not a required skill to be a chikfila shill. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (6 children) It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (6 children) It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (5 children) At no point does it imply I've never eaten it. You've chosen to infer that because you think it's a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (4 children) someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I'm still not missing out on anything. You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip -1 points 3 days ago (3 children) Does the implication I don't eat food at that time automatically mean I've never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago* (2 children) Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good? Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense. Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 0 points 3 days ago (1 child) You continuing this argument serves no purpose. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 days ago Yet here you are… permalink fedilink source parent