you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Given we're talking about the English language, yes /jk

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    Hey! Native speaker here. If we:

    • reformed the spelling

    • stopped the locals from coming out with any deranged shite that they liked the sound of and made them follow some rules instead

    ...then it would be a perfectly usable language, thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    "Reform the spelling" how would you go about that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

    "Refom de speling" hou wud ju go abaut dat?

    (Croatian way - write what you hear)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    If you think American English is bad, you should see British English.

    And before any Brits get their panties in a twist: no, all the unnecessary additions of "u" aren't original. You all did that after the American Revolution. You collectively had such a temper tantrum over losing a colony that you butchered your own language. Congratulations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    So you wanna introduce ß into English?

    Spaß bei Scherz, this reform changed one rule in German orthography so that it is slightly more phonetic (it's still considered non-phonetic) and it still caused a constitutional challenge.

    I like the change, but even today, 30 years later, you can find people who have not changed their spelling habits.

    If we reform English at this pace, sound changes will outrace us.

  • source
  • parent