I usually don't even understand the lingo they use. "Open-weighted" is the most recent one, then it usually goes down to specific "models" that everybody is supposed to know about.

These are my thoughts (I will stick to the vague "it" for now, but of course therein lies another question: "and how does all this apply to various specialised AIs"):

  • Is it really feasible to run it 100% locally? I know there's plenty of people with very powerful rigs indeed, but still. Or are 99% of these people really saying "it would, in theory, be possible to run that locally, therefore your concerns are invalid"?
  • If yes to the previous: the software doesn't come from nowhere and ultimately still relies on gas-turbine-powered datacenters and stolen IP and stolen personal data, no?

If what I wrote above is true, what exactly are people arguing when they say it's still possible to use LLMs ethically or true to FOSS philosophy, because ... ???


edit

Thanks to all who answered.

I guess it's my fault for asking several questions in one, but this thread has attracted exactly the type of people I'm writing about; several even used the term "open-weighted models" without explaining it.

Asking to get arguments explained, I got more arguments instead.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I run models locally on my 5070 i bought a year back for around 550€ (now costs around 900€ - insanity). Yes, it runs completely locally with pretty good results, and i am using an AM4 platform, which is now a few years old, and was also able to run smaller models with my 3070Ti with good speed.

My viewpoint regarding the models themselves is that since everything on the web has been used including everything i have put on the web in the last decades, there is also not much of an ethical problem here when using these things in a non-commercial setting - i am not making any money with it and i am not disseminating the output, and therefor i also do not cut into the profits of any creator (i mainly use it to automate tedious tasks or to get a complicated RegEx/sed/awk situation under control without breaking my brain - no cultural output like text or images). On a larger scale i would prefer it if models and datasets were under UNESCO stewardship - free for non-commercial use, with licenses being sold to corporations and organizations, where the income from the licenses get distributed to the people providing for the datasets (in this case in an opt-out basis - these models already represent a cultural snapshot of humanity, and the assumption is that artists WANT to add to human culture) or for financing young artists.

  • source