you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah that was a messed up thing to discover!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    It's interesting because we just assume everyone's internal experience is like ours, and everyone else assumes the same of us.

    When I was a kid, nobody told me I needed glasses, and I didn't think anyone could see the board, but ok, this is how the world is.

    And I'd been through years of "visualization" exercises never imagining that people were actually having vivid visual experiences; I interpreted all as metaphor (and also wondered what the big deal was--it was all so underwhelming!).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Yes, the visualization one is confusing for me, because I have a sense of images -which kind of sounds like what you're saying with 'metaphor' - but it's not a literal image, but at the same time, it's vivid like a natural image would be, even though it's not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Imagine an apple on a table.

    Did you do it?

    What kind of apple was it? What was the tabletop made of?

    I understand there's an apple on a table, and I have an idea of it, but it's hugely abstract. There's no specificity to any of it.

    Apparently "normal" people have a very definite image in mind for this test.

    It's called aphantasia, I think, if you want to learn more.

  • source
  • parent