submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

All nations within the Anglosphere (US, UK, CA, AU & NZ) have JD imposed towards citizens. I know that the US & Canada both inherited that from Britain, which explains why they have it. However, should it be entirely only the judge making the conviction (some countries operate on a lay-judge system meaning juries aren't used, such as Finland or Japan for example) rather than leaving that decision up to jurors?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 hour ago

in a country where the majority of judges are elected by popular vote or placed by political agemdas? nah i'd take the jury

  • source
  • parent