▲ 934 ▼ Quick, someone release Chatbot 2000! (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev 100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children) The only correct system is 0ver. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 child) I honestly love this idea unironically because its not really 1.0 until the bugs are gone and all desired features are present. If there are ever 2.0 plans, those are actually 1.0 plans and you were further behind than you thought permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago IMHO, the leading number should always be a fully distinct version from its preceding iterations. But, there are very few tech-fluent (much less capable) people pulling those levers, it seems. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 child) I honestly love this idea unironically because its not really 1.0 until the bugs are gone and all desired features are present. If there are ever 2.0 plans, those are actually 1.0 plans and you were further behind than you thought permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago IMHO, the leading number should always be a fully distinct version from its preceding iterations. But, there are very few tech-fluent (much less capable) people pulling those levers, it seems. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago IMHO, the leading number should always be a fully distinct version from its preceding iterations. But, there are very few tech-fluent (much less capable) people pulling those levers, it seems. permalink fedilink source parent
