Election Day is still a month away, but more than 700,000 Americans have already voted across at least 30 states. There are signs emerging of the advantage Democrats have in motivating their voters – a trend that’s played out in polling all summer long.

In several states with key Senate or governor races this fall, Democrats make up a larger share of voters requesting ballots so far than they did at this point in 2024.

In Iowa, Democrats have made 67% of ballot requests, up from 54% at this point in 2024. In Pennsylvania, it’s 66%, up from 62%, and in Maine it’s 57%, up from 53%. And according to data from the North Carolina State Board of Elections, 42% of ballot requests are from Democrats, up from 36% at this point two years ago.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 6 days ago* (11 children)

What's the alternative? Voting for the next version of Trump directly? I'm all for changing our system, but as it stands the only real viable options are team Trump, and Team Mightnotdoenough. I am not thrilled with the latter either, but it seems less than ideal to let the perfect be the enemy of the less bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 6 days ago* (5 children)

    Agreed. Don't get me wrong: the second these midterms are over I'm going full steam on pushing to reform Democrats away from the Schumers and Fettermans and so on. But until then, we gotta get as many of these Republicans out of office..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    After decades of failure you would think democrats would start to lose faith in the idea of reform. There is no reforming a system thats working exactly as designed,and they have safeguards in place to prevent structural change

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Just gonna point out that the proto-maga IE the Tea Party dipshits have their roots in things like the 90s rightwing militia movement and they arguably didn't gain full control of the Republican party until 2016 IMO even if they were a massive faction. Hell historically the faction that would evolve into the New Deal Democrats had its roots in various 1800s labor movements and didn't get to notability until the 1930s same general deal for the Square Deal Republicans just a bit earlier.

    Reform of this scale takes ages since you basically need to reach a saturation point, which basically requires constant pressure a bit like an inline fuel filter if the pressure stops the filter drys up. But I have noticed change since 2016 more specifically with younger libs who I wouldn't call economic progressives by any means being supportive of things like universal healthcare, expansion of welfare, demilitarization, and shrinking the police state. The problem is we have probably only reached 25 percent saturation at best, which means unless people get real comfortable with a lot of murder of the old guard it's gonna take awhile still to see active improvement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Tea Party was not an organic movement. It was an intentional shift to move the entire country to the right. As the Republicans move further to the right, it allowed Democrats to move further to the right with them. And the same thing is happening with Trump right now. As the GOP moves further to the right, the DNC will be in lockstep right behind them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Regardless of it being inorganic it still took time for the process to work. My point was just to do with the timescales of these things, arguably the biggest hint of the Tea Party being inorganic was that it took a short period of time relative to say the New Dealers or Square Dealers who both took about 40 years to establish. Mind you social media tends to accelerate things but expecting instant change is a tad bit foolish, especially when we have to push a boiler up a hill the entire time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

    Its those same democrats you are supporting that will give us the next version of Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

    That response seems to be functionally identical to the one I responded to already. Am I missing something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Dude wants trump, he just doesn't want to admit it. So he's framing it as "if we don't reelect trump the Democrats will give us trump and that's bad"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    I don't want Trump any more than you do, but it's Democrats that have given us Trump both times. By failing to address the material needs of the working class and as the RNC continues to move further to the right the DNC will be in lockstep behind them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    The way this is phrased infuriates me, because it's disengenious bullshit that just so happens to remove responsibility for the people who couldn't get off their behinds and do the absolute minimum to stop fascism. The Democrats did not "give us Trump." They LOST TO TRUMP, because not enough people voted for them. These are not the same thing. They are Trump's opposition. The reason why Trump got more votes than his opposition is because more people in this country are conservative (as well as the way the electoral college is set up.) The Democrats not being leftist enough is not the reason Trump won, he won because the country is full of rascists and people who only give a shit about politics when gas costs too much.

  • source
  • parent