21
Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 4th October 2026 (awful.systems)
submitted 5 days ago by to c/techtakes@awful.systems
154 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

(The spooks shall soon be upon us.)

Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid - welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Didn't one of Aella's "studies" into women's sexuality turn up results that quite a lot of women surveyed had fantasies about being in a submissive role in a relationship or sexual encounter, up to and including aggression? Rationalists would naturally recycle that kind of subjective, context-free nugget of information into proof that most women want men to be dominant and aggressive in real-life flirting or sex. So it follows that it's fine to approach women this way (though somehow they're usually approaching leople with less power than them, not say, their boss or their boss's wife). And if they treat a woman this way and she doesn't like it then they convince themselves that they still didn't do anything wrong because they had good reason to believe she would like it. They might even think that she's just pretending she doesn't like being spoken to or treated that way because she's been taught it's disrespectful.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Some people are into the idea of being so attractive it overpowers others' self-control. Or, they like to imagine freedom from responsibility—mentally placing themselves in a situation where they cannot be judged for lustfulness. Or both. And hey, no condemnation here.

    The idea of a fantasy seems to be too much for Rationalist big brains to handle. I'm sure it can't be a motivated failure of comprehension, not at all.... /s

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •