Is it really necessary to send humans to those places just to get the knock-on benefits? Couldn't we do those things directly, without going there?

It seems to me that, today, those who have the money to spend on these endeavors would only do so if there were perceived short-term benefits to themselves. That means they plan to exploit the resources, or increase their own power somehow.

I know the good engineers that make this happen are doing it for the challenge and in the pursuit of knowledge, and I know that's why we poors support it, but that doesn't "pay the bills." What is the motivation behind the money? Why are they really doing this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Rocket fuel. The moon is like the local gas station you stop at to top off the tank and get snacks before you hit the open road.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago (2 children)

    The Moon is basically devoid of rocket fuel or its ingredients so it will need to be brought there. The question is, what kind of craft are you going to send and where to warrant Moon refueling as opposed to just another multi-stage rocket?

    Even then, the tank can be designed for unmanned operation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago

    Pro tip: Not making the person feel like an idiot goes a long way into making your information reach more places.

    I searched for some terms and you get your usual articles of "greatest energy source found" mixed in with plenty of slop. Its hard to take any of those at face value nowadays when news outlets tend to exaggerate everything science related. Not even mentioning the article you posted has a pay or login wall.

  • source
  • parent