Is it really necessary to send humans to those places just to get the knock-on benefits? Couldn't we do those things directly, without going there?

It seems to me that, today, those who have the money to spend on these endeavors would only do so if there were perceived short-term benefits to themselves. That means they plan to exploit the resources, or increase their own power somehow.

I know the good engineers that make this happen are doing it for the challenge and in the pursuit of knowledge, and I know that's why we poors support it, but that doesn't "pay the bills." What is the motivation behind the money? Why are they really doing this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

The Moon is a staging area and supply of resources. Lunar launch costs are almost negligible to Earth, so large scale mining of rare earths, deuterium, and other metals is viable. And the low gravity means building/launching giant ships capable of reaching the outer solar system is possible.

The research and knowledge gained from a lunar base would almost certainly far exceed the cost of building it as well. Science and practices in medical and botanical fields that would be directly applicable here on Earth, but are not possible or would not be studied without the existence of a lunar base.

If you're looking at future opportunity, figure out how to make a cheap and effective heat shield out of lunar regolith in a vacuum. The major cost of returning materials to Earth is the return vehicle. Having to send parts from Earth very quickly makes everything unprofitable.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    large scale mining of rare earths, deuterium, and other metals is viable.

    Science fiction.

    To mine anything of value would mean it has to be rarer than on earth, and that still means generating millions of tonnes of ore and smelting and processing it....in a zero atmosphere environment, with not large power sources, then somehow do this cheaper than on Earth, with 1000x more danger. It would have to start with building habitats for thousands.

    The amount of bullshit on moon mining is huge even by Elon Musk standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago

    It doesn't have to be more rare than Earth metals, supply just has to be more limited than demand. Given the rising use cases, and the global population, it's only a question of time until economic viability. Especially in cases, like now, where supply is constrained by political tensions. It becomes a national security issue to not have a sovereign supply. Lunar mining is cheaper than a resource war.

  • source
  • parent