submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -16 points 19 hours ago (13 children)

Insurance is gambling. You pay more in premiums than you get back in repayments after crashing. The house always wins.

Yet without Insurance business doesn't function. Loss of expensive cargo or equipment wipes out the company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 hours ago

    You are correct, because literally every choice we make is a gamble. Even crossing the street is "gambling" on getting hit by a drunk driver. But of course most insurance companies add a level of scammery and greed that is completely beyond any necessary price to protect farmers from a bad crop year etc. so ppl will rain hatred on your comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 19 hours ago* (8 children)

    No insurance is risk distribution. We all pay 5$ so none of us needs to pay 5,000,000$ which is not economically sustainable. What insurance companies get is administrative overhead fee. This has nothing to do with gambling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (2 children)

    The price of an insurance product is divided in 4 parts, the risk, the actuarial adjustment, administrative and distribution costs, and return of capital.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago (1 child)

    Aren't the risk and the actuarial adjustment the same thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    No, the risk is the probability of a claim times the value of a claim. If you just charge that is mathematically proven that the insurance pool is going to fail. The actuarial adjustment is there to create a surplus that guarantee the survival of the pool.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago* (3 children)

    Nah nah nah; Insurance is like preem gammbling.

    For example insurance companies couldn't pay everyone back after Hurrican Katrina. First come first serve I guess. :P

    To my understanding insurance companies isolate areas so if that area gets hit hard. The insurance company just files bankruptcy in the area and moves on..

    You gamble with which bookie (insurance company) you choose. You gamble when you choose where to live. You gamble how fast you can make your insurance claim. This shit is gambling through and through. And we ("The Common Person") are getting fleeced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    Insurance may be its own type of evil, but it's not gambling. It serves me a financial purpose. It protects me from certain enormous and unexpected expenses which would otherwise cripple me financially for the rest of my life.

    How aggressively insurance deny claims may be a symptom of the same problem to the ubiquity of online gambling apps and ads, unchecked greed, but they're not the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 hours ago

    IMHO we need peer to peer prediction markets, in which the insurance company is not the same party deciding who won the bet. Then your risk of denial would be more clear up front.

    I don't even know that I should refuse jobs that offer insurance through UnitedHealthcare until Luigi.

  • source
  • parent