CmdrShepard49 comments on Stanford University admits AI was used to ‘race swap’ student photo

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

You werent talking about any specific system at all until that user mentioned Affinity. I think you're moving the goal posts here as youre now trying to frame the discussion as if you were talking about some other yet unnamed system the whole time when your original comment mentioned nothing of the sort.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If that is in fact how the system in question works.

We know that’s how the system works by the fact...

We know how THIS system works - but...

They cast doubt, I point out proof, they deflect to other systems they might be right about. Sounds like they moved the goalposts to me. I don't need to know which system it is to know it does what we can see it do.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

It is worth remembering that AI replaces the ENTIRE image, even if you ask it to change only one thing.

This is what they replied to. You made a blanket statement about using AI to edit photos not anything about any particular program or system. Furthermore, you can't know which system was used here as you dont know whether all these changes were intentionally done or simply a byproduct of using something that changes the entire image.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

I point out proof

That wasn't proof of anything. Not only does it not make any sense in the context of the discussion, it was incorrect ("every single person in the image looks different"), as there are more than three people in the image that you probably didn't notice, and they appear to be largely untouched.

Brother... are you an AI?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent