In a hearing convened by Canada’s Alberta Human Rights Tribunal on Monday, the lawyer for an anti-transgender advocate in the small town of Westlock (90 miles north of Edmonton), argued that a flyer distributed by her client calling on residents to protest the installation of a rainbow crosswalk with a trans flag was not hate speech, but an exercise in “free speech.”

“Could it be upsetting? Yes. Could it cause hurt feelings? Yes. But does it cause a person to feel hatred or contempt for trans individuals? We will say the answer to that question is a resounding no,” attorney Allison Pejovic said in opening remarks at the hearing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 6 days ago (1 child)

I don’t disagree, I just worry a lot about that last point you made. This could easily become a cudgel for all sorts of things that worry me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 days ago*

    Yea fair. I actually just reworded it slightly.

    At a certain point we have to remember that fascism always seeks to usurp the spirit of laws by threatening us with the letters of the laws.

    It's already a cudgel. Pro-ICE kid that got hit full video. Quantitatively speaking, I don't think what you're concerned about is even a blip on the radar compared to the social harm already being experienced every day. Like yes people could go to jail under a 'bad government' but like conservatism is literally killing the planet. I'll cross that other bridge if we even get there.

  • source
  • parent