you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Either way, the actual goal of censoring news from the White House is achieved... and in the case of this solidarity, the effect is even greater. Or am I misunderstanding something here?

/edit: Okay I actually misunderstood something: Its not about media coverage in total but about giving Trump a platform. This makes much more sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    They just won't be asking Trump questions directly. Nothing else changes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Does it change anything? They will still get the video feed and can react to it. It's just their reporters not being there at the moment to ask questions. Trump will still spout nonsense continuously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The networks also provide the audio tech:

    Trump’s first live event on Monday with no TV press pool — a ribbon-cutting ceremony for his new helipad — was livestreamed to the White House website. However, Trump’s remarks were indiscernible throughout the video; the helicopter’s loud noise completely drowned out his voice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment