cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/45744344

http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/roach-2

Alt textThis isn't a metaphor. Just a story about a roach.

Bonus panelBonus panel

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 week ago* (8 children)

And now I have to go Google what you are talking about, making you that guy 😜

Edit: So you don't have to Google it: some apparently famous woman appears in an ad for a company without morals who profits off of exploiting addiction and ignorance, and she is almost entirely nude in most of the ads

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    she is almost entirely nude in most of the ads

    That will stop people from looking it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Dunno why though. The internet is full of actual porn, why bother going to look for some g rated pseudo porn that's actually just an ad?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    In the same vain, most tits look very similar, so if you saw like 10 different pairs, you get the gist of it and you wouldn't be surprised by new ones. Yet, for some reason, people keep looking at photos of bare chested women all the time, over and over again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    For those who need slightly more info to not Google it, some actress reached out to some sports betting site (edit:shoe company) and spearheaded an ad that is basically a sports illustrated "body issue" where she puts on some gear or holds some sportsball or stick in front of the naughty bits. The whole controversy is about the sexualization of women on sports (obviously)

    Tap for spoilerThat's my 2 minute analysis while on my morning walk, so take it with a container of salt

  • source
  • parent