51
Does it seem like religious people are less animal friendly? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 12 hours ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have been noting this more recently and it seems to be a trend, at least with people I converse with on the regular. The really religious types aren't animal people or downright dont like them. The more chill or agnostic types seem to be more apt to love animals.

I could go on my theory of this but I'm interested to see if anyone thinks this is a trend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 hours ago* (1 child)

For your first question: there is no certainty that Harambe would have “ripped the kid in half”.

For your second, you could value some species more than your own and others less, there’s no reason all species must be equally valuable (let alone individuals) Although the idea of thinking about things that way at all is a little gross to me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

    Is it genuinely your belief that the kid would have been fine? Or even any 100% safe solution outside of what happened? What was done ensured the safety of the human child, as it should have. You're misusing false dichotomy. The user I was responding to stated

    "Typical creature that values it's own species over all others."

    The all or nothing aspect I gave is a direct response to the one they gave. The implication being the user does not value human life over all other life. I do, which is why this started and is ending as a binary conversation. Secondary to that, whats better than what in a tier list is completely irrelevant to the conversation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent