you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (8 children)

So the definitions I've seen here are:

  • Bisexuals are only attracted to cis people, pansexuals are attracted to cis, trans, and nonbinary people
  • Bisexuals are only attracted to binary genders, while pansexuals are attracted to all genders
  • Bisexuals are attracted based on looks, pansexuals are attracted based on personality (possibly means they're demi too)
  • Bisexuals are attracted to people because of gendered characteristics, pansexuals are attracted to people regardless of gendered characteristics (not really sure what this one means, different wording of the previous one?)
  • Bisexuals aren't attracted to GNC people or androgyny, pansexuals are attracted to all gender presentations
  • "Bisexual" is transphobic, pansexual is the more inclusive one
  • Bisexual has always been inclusive, pansexual was unnecessary and is transphobic and/or biphobic
  • Bisexuals are attracted to more than one gender, pansexuals are attracted to all genders
  • Bisexuals are monogamous, pansexuals are polyamorous
  • Bisexuals like the bi flag, pansexuals like the pan flag
  • Plus various other joke definitions

Did I miss any? A couple of these were new to me. Innovations in the discourse?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    First two are biphobic.

    • Bisexuals are attracted to people because of gendered characteristics, pansexuals are attracted to people regardless of gendered characteristics (not really sure what this one means, different wording of the previous one?)

    As an example of this, a bisexual might find muscular women attractive, but not muscular men, but pansexuals find muscles attractive or not on all people. This is the definition I use.

    • Bisexuals are attracted to more than one gender, pansexuals are attracted to all genders

    The thing I find troublesome about this is that it can overly lump people into bisexuality. A common definition for lesbian today is someone who is not a man who is attracted to people who aren't men. If that's your definition of lesbian and bisexual than you're saying lesbians are bisexual. I prefer to say bisexual is attracted to all genders.

    • Bisexuals are monogamous, pansexuals are polyamorous

    Weird seeing this because traditionally the harmful stereotype is that bisexuals need two lovers. Either way, this is not a good definition.

    • Bisexuals like the bi flag, pansexuals like the pan flag

    This is one that's silly, but kind ends up being true sometimes. Bi and pan are incredibly overlapped. Not all bi people are pan and not all pan people are bi, yes, but there's a lot of overlap. So a lot people in the middle just pick the flag they prefer.

    Also I will die on the hill that pansexuality is not a subset of bisexuality. Not all pansexuals are bisexual.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 13 hours ago (1 child)

    In regards to the 4th one, that's how I've always kinda described it. I consider myself bi because I am attracted to men, women, and NBs differently. My sister considers herself pan because there is no difference in the way she feels attracted to someone based on their gender.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment