you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 19 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

The right time for nuclear power was decades ago, which could have offset our current carbon issues by a lot, but alas. Now is the time for solar+wind+batteries, it's already cheaper in most places and a lot less dangerous if something goes wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Funny thing though, if you look at the data, nuclear is safer than wind and solar per kWh in deaths because installers and maintainers keep falling from rooftops and wind turbines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    Oh I'm inclined to believe that, but even ignoring Chernobyl and similar situations, fact remains that nuclear waste would pile up and create another generation's issues. Better than oil? Absolutely. But renewables are where I'll place my bets for a better tomorrow now.

    Also in both cases we need batteries, as nuclear isn't quick to start or stop, and peaks or drops in usage need covering, so if I'd make one wish it's advancement in battery tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago

    Agreed, I just wanted to preempt any "well akshually, nuclear power is perfectly clean" discussions.

    The "if something goes wrong" is certainly part of my reservations. There's been more than one example of that happening in my lifetime, and one was too many.

    Another concern is that we have no better idea to dispose of the nuclear waste than burying it really deep. That sounds like a good recipe to have it come back and bite future generations in the ass.

    So yeah, clean and sustainable would mean solar/hydro/wind energy in my mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

    Don't let the nuclear cult hear such blasphemic facts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 12 hours ago (2 children)

    cult investors

    There, fixed that for you 🙂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Those are to different groups, the investors into nuclear spending some money (but neglectable amounts compared to their primary investments) on desinformation campaign so idiots stay on the train, and the idiot cult created as part of those campaigns. That's what makes such investment so efficient. Once you reached a criritcal mass the bunch of morons is self-replicating in their own echo chambers, so it doesn't need maintenance anymore. (Also the reason nuclear is so well received in far-right circles... there isn't actually a direct connection, but a massive overlap in how these groups are created.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment