September 14, 2026

[They caved, dammit.]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 4 hours ago (1 child)

I get it, but I also think that those that benefit the most from our society, have a larger butden than most when it comes to speaking up about these issues.

Ed Sheeran has enough money, and has enough resources that he could take a stand himself. I could give it more of a pass had it not been for the him saying Macklemore’s words were offensive to some. I’ve heard what he said and it’s very clear it’s a supportive and positive message.

It’s a tough situation without a doubt, and in any other times it would be not a big deal. But man, what a shit state the world is in where standing up against dead kids is an offensive message that could end a music tour.

It’s not aggression, it’s deep regret, sadness and desperation for some humanity in the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago*

    I subscribe the 10/20/40/20/10 theory of human behavior, so I see the opportunist that he is where to go from there. To paraphrase, 10% of people are selfless, 20 prefer benevolence, 40 go with the flow, 20 prefer selfishness, and 10 are perfectly selfish. This is particularly relevant for public figures.

    Give Sheeran money and he'll say whatever. Give or take away his money and he'll be cajoled one way or another. He'll basically never rise to any occasion because that is not who he is, and that's not who most public figures are. Because it is more often useful to appear benevolent, celebrities tend to appear selfless. There's nothing to it beyond that.

    To phrase this another way, take away the stick and provide your own carrot to gain the totality of the central 40% in an instant. People like this fence-riding fuckstick. There's really nothing else to it.

  • source
  • parent