โฒ 226 โผ ๐ก๐ก๐ก (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by ooli3@sopuli.xyz [M] to c/imgoingtohellforthis@sopuli.xyz 44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 days ago (10 children) How about stop posting poorly cropped memes. This trend is as annoying as poorly censored words. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [โ] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago permalink fedilink source parent [โ] plateee@piefed.social 67 points 2 days ago* (2 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] egrets@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago permalink fedilink source parent [โ] puz@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (4 children) I'm not much on mainstream social media anymore. But what is it with all this censoring bullshit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children) Years of social media conditioning. People are scared to post what they want lest they be de-platformed. That's where "unalived" and "grape" come from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] puz@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago yea ok. then i'm again at a point where I don't get censoring at all. We all know that "to unalive" means "kill" and even a kid would get that. We all know when a person on TV says FUCK when they put a little beep over the U but we still hear the F and CK sound. So if we all keep doing/saying ""bad"" things but now in badly cropped memes or barely censored, then who are we doing this for? For the algorithm which would flag this automatically? permalink fedilink source parent [โ] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I agree with you that self censoring by way of developing algo-safe speak... is very fucking silly to do in places where that actual censoring doesn't exist. But! In at least this case, I think the shitty crop makes it funnier, in the way a badly shot or framed picture can imply hurriedness or lack of skill or care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago I would agree, except I see it over and over again. It feels more like someone just trying to generate content without caring. More Algo-behavior. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] sukhmel@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago I guess it's poorly cropped as a way of poorly censoring, so two-in-one permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] plateee@piefed.social 67 points 2 days ago* (2 children) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] egrets@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] egrets@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 day ago permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] puz@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (4 children) I'm not much on mainstream social media anymore. But what is it with all this censoring bullshit? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children) Years of social media conditioning. People are scared to post what they want lest they be de-platformed. That's where "unalived" and "grape" come from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] puz@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago yea ok. then i'm again at a point where I don't get censoring at all. We all know that "to unalive" means "kill" and even a kid would get that. We all know when a person on TV says FUCK when they put a little beep over the U but we still hear the F and CK sound. So if we all keep doing/saying ""bad"" things but now in badly cropped memes or barely censored, then who are we doing this for? For the algorithm which would flag this automatically? permalink fedilink source parent [โ] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I agree with you that self censoring by way of developing algo-safe speak... is very fucking silly to do in places where that actual censoring doesn't exist. But! In at least this case, I think the shitty crop makes it funnier, in the way a badly shot or framed picture can imply hurriedness or lack of skill or care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago I would agree, except I see it over and over again. It feels more like someone just trying to generate content without caring. More Algo-behavior. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children) Years of social media conditioning. People are scared to post what they want lest they be de-platformed. That's where "unalived" and "grape" come from. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [โ] puz@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago yea ok. then i'm again at a point where I don't get censoring at all. We all know that "to unalive" means "kill" and even a kid would get that. We all know when a person on TV says FUCK when they put a little beep over the U but we still hear the F and CK sound. So if we all keep doing/saying ""bad"" things but now in badly cropped memes or barely censored, then who are we doing this for? For the algorithm which would flag this automatically? permalink fedilink source parent [โ] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I agree with you that self censoring by way of developing algo-safe speak... is very fucking silly to do in places where that actual censoring doesn't exist. But! In at least this case, I think the shitty crop makes it funnier, in the way a badly shot or framed picture can imply hurriedness or lack of skill or care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago I would agree, except I see it over and over again. It feels more like someone just trying to generate content without caring. More Algo-behavior. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] puz@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago yea ok. then i'm again at a point where I don't get censoring at all. We all know that "to unalive" means "kill" and even a kid would get that. We all know when a person on TV says FUCK when they put a little beep over the U but we still hear the F and CK sound. So if we all keep doing/saying ""bad"" things but now in badly cropped memes or barely censored, then who are we doing this for? For the algorithm which would flag this automatically? permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (1 child) I agree with you that self censoring by way of developing algo-safe speak... is very fucking silly to do in places where that actual censoring doesn't exist. But! In at least this case, I think the shitty crop makes it funnier, in the way a badly shot or framed picture can imply hurriedness or lack of skill or care. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago I would agree, except I see it over and over again. It feels more like someone just trying to generate content without caring. More Algo-behavior. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago I would agree, except I see it over and over again. It feels more like someone just trying to generate content without caring. More Algo-behavior. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] sukhmel@programming.dev 7 points 2 days ago I guess it's poorly cropped as a way of poorly censoring, so two-in-one permalink fedilink source parent