▲ 543 ▼ Move over, unpaid internships -- the Groksuckers are pushing for reverse salaries now (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 days ago by destructdisc@lemmy.world to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world 231 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 110 points 2 days ago (12 children) “Cooper AI Co-founder & CEO” Why would you expect her take to be anything but brain-dead? permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 42 points 2 days ago (5 children) Exactly. Im pretty sure graduates aren't beating down her door for the opportunity to work for her. Sniffing her own farts too much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (4 children) It's 2026 and yes, I can imagine that there are some rich college kids who think paying for an internship with her would be a smart move. They'd get a chance to build up contacts and see how she operates. Telling the Queen how good her farts smell has long been a path to success. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 19 hours ago But only for those incapable of learning to live off lentils permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (2 children) Idk there's a bunch of 'contacts' I know, and I'd think someone is a shitheel if another shitheel was talking them up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Ummm, it's 2026. What exactly makes you think that being scum is somehow a barrier to success? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 21 hours ago It's not, I'm not the one checking references. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Dwayne_Elizondo_Mountain_Dew_Camacho@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (5 children) I'm pretty underwhelmed before even clicking... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children) Because, as we all know, the only people who can be adequately replaced by the inference-free prediction machine are business idiots. Everyone else has a real job that actually requires real intelligence instead of prediction algorithms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children) Funny enough, though their jobs would be the easiest to replace, they are "important" in that they can be held legally responsible for business decisions (Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine). That's partly why they get tens of millions of dollars - so they can take the fall when shit hits the fan (either they fuck the shareholders or majorly break the law). This is known as the "Scapegoating Premium" - you are basically paid for the risk of taking on a very public, high liability/visibility position. The corporation pays their legal fees and has insurance to help with this, but it's compensation for the possibility of legal and reputational damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (2 children) Very little risk. Laughable in most countries. C-Suite accountability translating to truly damaging punishment, like jail time, is almost nil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 point 7 hours ago Yeah, I'll believe corporations (or c-suites) are people when Texas executes one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* Oh for sure. But regardless, the potential for reputational harm and liability are part of why named execs get these ridiculous sums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 42 points 2 days ago (5 children) Exactly. Im pretty sure graduates aren't beating down her door for the opportunity to work for her. Sniffing her own farts too much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (4 children) It's 2026 and yes, I can imagine that there are some rich college kids who think paying for an internship with her would be a smart move. They'd get a chance to build up contacts and see how she operates. Telling the Queen how good her farts smell has long been a path to success. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 19 hours ago But only for those incapable of learning to live off lentils permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (2 children) Idk there's a bunch of 'contacts' I know, and I'd think someone is a shitheel if another shitheel was talking them up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Ummm, it's 2026. What exactly makes you think that being scum is somehow a barrier to success? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 21 hours ago It's not, I'm not the one checking references. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago (4 children) It's 2026 and yes, I can imagine that there are some rich college kids who think paying for an internship with her would be a smart move. They'd get a chance to build up contacts and see how she operates. Telling the Queen how good her farts smell has long been a path to success. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 19 hours ago But only for those incapable of learning to live off lentils permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (2 children) Idk there's a bunch of 'contacts' I know, and I'd think someone is a shitheel if another shitheel was talking them up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Ummm, it's 2026. What exactly makes you think that being scum is somehow a barrier to success? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 21 hours ago It's not, I'm not the one checking references. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 point 19 hours ago But only for those incapable of learning to live off lentils permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (2 children) Idk there's a bunch of 'contacts' I know, and I'd think someone is a shitheel if another shitheel was talking them up permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Ummm, it's 2026. What exactly makes you think that being scum is somehow a barrier to success? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 21 hours ago It's not, I'm not the one checking references. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Ummm, it's 2026. What exactly makes you think that being scum is somehow a barrier to success? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 21 hours ago It's not, I'm not the one checking references. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 21 hours ago It's not, I'm not the one checking references. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Dwayne_Elizondo_Mountain_Dew_Camacho@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (5 children) I'm pretty underwhelmed before even clicking... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children) Because, as we all know, the only people who can be adequately replaced by the inference-free prediction machine are business idiots. Everyone else has a real job that actually requires real intelligence instead of prediction algorithms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children) Funny enough, though their jobs would be the easiest to replace, they are "important" in that they can be held legally responsible for business decisions (Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine). That's partly why they get tens of millions of dollars - so they can take the fall when shit hits the fan (either they fuck the shareholders or majorly break the law). This is known as the "Scapegoating Premium" - you are basically paid for the risk of taking on a very public, high liability/visibility position. The corporation pays their legal fees and has insurance to help with this, but it's compensation for the possibility of legal and reputational damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (2 children) Very little risk. Laughable in most countries. C-Suite accountability translating to truly damaging punishment, like jail time, is almost nil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 point 7 hours ago Yeah, I'll believe corporations (or c-suites) are people when Texas executes one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* Oh for sure. But regardless, the potential for reputational harm and liability are part of why named execs get these ridiculous sums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children) Because, as we all know, the only people who can be adequately replaced by the inference-free prediction machine are business idiots. Everyone else has a real job that actually requires real intelligence instead of prediction algorithms. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children) Funny enough, though their jobs would be the easiest to replace, they are "important" in that they can be held legally responsible for business decisions (Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine). That's partly why they get tens of millions of dollars - so they can take the fall when shit hits the fan (either they fuck the shareholders or majorly break the law). This is known as the "Scapegoating Premium" - you are basically paid for the risk of taking on a very public, high liability/visibility position. The corporation pays their legal fees and has insurance to help with this, but it's compensation for the possibility of legal and reputational damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (2 children) Very little risk. Laughable in most countries. C-Suite accountability translating to truly damaging punishment, like jail time, is almost nil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 point 7 hours ago Yeah, I'll believe corporations (or c-suites) are people when Texas executes one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* Oh for sure. But regardless, the potential for reputational harm and liability are part of why named execs get these ridiculous sums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children) Funny enough, though their jobs would be the easiest to replace, they are "important" in that they can be held legally responsible for business decisions (Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine). That's partly why they get tens of millions of dollars - so they can take the fall when shit hits the fan (either they fuck the shareholders or majorly break the law). This is known as the "Scapegoating Premium" - you are basically paid for the risk of taking on a very public, high liability/visibility position. The corporation pays their legal fees and has insurance to help with this, but it's compensation for the possibility of legal and reputational damage. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (2 children) Very little risk. Laughable in most countries. C-Suite accountability translating to truly damaging punishment, like jail time, is almost nil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 point 7 hours ago Yeah, I'll believe corporations (or c-suites) are people when Texas executes one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* Oh for sure. But regardless, the potential for reputational harm and liability are part of why named execs get these ridiculous sums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (2 children) Very little risk. Laughable in most countries. C-Suite accountability translating to truly damaging punishment, like jail time, is almost nil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 point 7 hours ago Yeah, I'll believe corporations (or c-suites) are people when Texas executes one. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* Oh for sure. But regardless, the potential for reputational harm and liability are part of why named execs get these ridiculous sums. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 point 7 hours ago Yeah, I'll believe corporations (or c-suites) are people when Texas executes one. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* Oh for sure. But regardless, the potential for reputational harm and liability are part of why named execs get these ridiculous sums. permalink fedilink source parent