▲ 97 ▼ Unbiased = Confirming my biases (thelemmy.club) submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by 1Malayali@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 49 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources You can notice a bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes from the above.
[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 16 hours ago (12 children) Also it's doing unionbusting permalink fedilink source hideshow 12 child comments replies: [+] muzzle@lemmy.zip -21 points 14 hours ago (11 children) Yes. The meme is bullshit. The wikipedia community has always covered every kind of atrocity and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. But the union busting really is Really shitty behavior from the wikimedia organization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 hours ago (1 child) and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. My god, how are you people so fucking brainless? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] elixir_fan@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago Because you hoard the brain in a box! (sorry, couldn't help myself) permalink fedilink source parent [–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml [S] 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children) maintain a neutral pow Neutral POV as per themselves? Or is it some external agency? Agency made up of all sides? And do you see this as neutral? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources You can notice the bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip -5 points 7 hours ago (1 child) ? If it was pro-capitalist China would be green, the divide is USA and their colonies vs perceived potential threats to it's domination. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) This is the moderating repository of knowledge in the western media ecosystem all but admitting that they do not actually consider China a capitalist state. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 39 points 14 hours ago* (3 children) Allowing only western sources is not "truly trying to maintaining a neutral pov" as all sources have a bias permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -4 points 12 hours ago (2 children) Does Wikipedia really only allow Western sources? I don’t know if that’s true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] huf@hexbear.net 25 points 12 hours ago (1 child) wikipedia considers government propaganda sources like the BBC and Voice of America (dont laugh) to be reliable, as long as they're western government propaganda sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -3 points 11 hours ago But I don’t think it’s true Wiki only allows Western sources permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 35 points 14 hours ago Don't give the Wikipedia community too much credit. The union-busting goes hand-in-hand with the western liberal frame that every article is presented with. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sushiatnight@lemmy.ml 27 points 14 hours ago The wikipedia community has always covered every kind of atrocity and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. lol permalink fedilink source parent
[+] muzzle@lemmy.zip -21 points 14 hours ago (11 children) Yes. The meme is bullshit. The wikipedia community has always covered every kind of atrocity and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. But the union busting really is Really shitty behavior from the wikimedia organization. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 hours ago (1 child) and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. My god, how are you people so fucking brainless? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] elixir_fan@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago Because you hoard the brain in a box! (sorry, couldn't help myself) permalink fedilink source parent [–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml [S] 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children) maintain a neutral pow Neutral POV as per themselves? Or is it some external agency? Agency made up of all sides? And do you see this as neutral? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources You can notice the bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip -5 points 7 hours ago (1 child) ? If it was pro-capitalist China would be green, the divide is USA and their colonies vs perceived potential threats to it's domination. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) This is the moderating repository of knowledge in the western media ecosystem all but admitting that they do not actually consider China a capitalist state. permalink fedilink source parent [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 39 points 14 hours ago* (3 children) Allowing only western sources is not "truly trying to maintaining a neutral pov" as all sources have a bias permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -4 points 12 hours ago (2 children) Does Wikipedia really only allow Western sources? I don’t know if that’s true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] huf@hexbear.net 25 points 12 hours ago (1 child) wikipedia considers government propaganda sources like the BBC and Voice of America (dont laugh) to be reliable, as long as they're western government propaganda sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -3 points 11 hours ago But I don’t think it’s true Wiki only allows Western sources permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 35 points 14 hours ago Don't give the Wikipedia community too much credit. The union-busting goes hand-in-hand with the western liberal frame that every article is presented with. permalink fedilink source parent [–] sushiatnight@lemmy.ml 27 points 14 hours ago The wikipedia community has always covered every kind of atrocity and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 12 points 8 hours ago (1 child) and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. My god, how are you people so fucking brainless? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] elixir_fan@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago Because you hoard the brain in a box! (sorry, couldn't help myself) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] elixir_fan@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago Because you hoard the brain in a box! (sorry, couldn't help myself) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 1Malayali@lemmy.ml [S] 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children) maintain a neutral pow Neutral POV as per themselves? Or is it some external agency? Agency made up of all sides? And do you see this as neutral? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources You can notice the bias towards the state media from pro-capitalist regimes permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip -5 points 7 hours ago (1 child) ? If it was pro-capitalist China would be green, the divide is USA and their colonies vs perceived potential threats to it's domination. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) This is the moderating repository of knowledge in the western media ecosystem all but admitting that they do not actually consider China a capitalist state. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip -5 points 7 hours ago (1 child) ? If it was pro-capitalist China would be green, the divide is USA and their colonies vs perceived potential threats to it's domination. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) This is the moderating repository of knowledge in the western media ecosystem all but admitting that they do not actually consider China a capitalist state. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) This is the moderating repository of knowledge in the western media ecosystem all but admitting that they do not actually consider China a capitalist state. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 39 points 14 hours ago* (3 children) Allowing only western sources is not "truly trying to maintaining a neutral pov" as all sources have a bias permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -4 points 12 hours ago (2 children) Does Wikipedia really only allow Western sources? I don’t know if that’s true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] huf@hexbear.net 25 points 12 hours ago (1 child) wikipedia considers government propaganda sources like the BBC and Voice of America (dont laugh) to be reliable, as long as they're western government propaganda sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -3 points 11 hours ago But I don’t think it’s true Wiki only allows Western sources permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lussy@hexbear.net -4 points 12 hours ago (2 children) Does Wikipedia really only allow Western sources? I don’t know if that’s true permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] huf@hexbear.net 25 points 12 hours ago (1 child) wikipedia considers government propaganda sources like the BBC and Voice of America (dont laugh) to be reliable, as long as they're western government propaganda sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -3 points 11 hours ago But I don’t think it’s true Wiki only allows Western sources permalink fedilink source parent
[–] huf@hexbear.net 25 points 12 hours ago (1 child) wikipedia considers government propaganda sources like the BBC and Voice of America (dont laugh) to be reliable, as long as they're western government propaganda sources. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Lussy@hexbear.net -3 points 11 hours ago But I don’t think it’s true Wiki only allows Western sources permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lussy@hexbear.net -3 points 11 hours ago But I don’t think it’s true Wiki only allows Western sources permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 35 points 14 hours ago Don't give the Wikipedia community too much credit. The union-busting goes hand-in-hand with the western liberal frame that every article is presented with. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sushiatnight@lemmy.ml 27 points 14 hours ago The wikipedia community has always covered every kind of atrocity and has truly tried to maintain a neutral pow. lol permalink fedilink source parent